ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2024
A roadmap for assessing the diagnostic usefulness of neurosensory testing and an updated method for exposure assessment among vibration-exposed workers in northern Sweden.
Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors influencing Purdue Pegboard test results among hand-arm vibration-exposed workers.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic test performance of screening questions for neurosensory hand-arm vibration injury.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- The diagnostic test performance of clinical point-of-care testing in relation to quantitative sensory testing for neurosensory injury among workers exposed to hand-arm vibration.Journal of occupational health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Workers who use handheld vibrating machines such as grinders, hammers and chainsaws expose themselves to hand-arm vibration (HAV). Exposure to HAV may cause injuries to both the neurological and the vascular system. The occupational health services (OHS) in Sweden use a formal guideline for secondary prevention focusing on early detection of vibration-related injuries. The guide includes several screening tools, such as a screening questionnaire, clinical examinations, and laboratory tests. There are no studies, to our knowledge, on the diagnostic value of the separate items on symptoms in the screening questionnaire in relation to the laboratory tests or the clinical examinations performed during a medical examination among patients exposed to HAV. Furthermore, the recently presented ISO standard for HAV measurements (ISO/TR 18,750) has only been tested for vascular injuries and not neurological injuries. This research roadmap aims to evaluate separate items in a screening questionnaire on neurological symptoms in relation to laboratory and clinical tests among HAV exposed workers in the Arctic region of Northern Sweden. It also covers a comparison of the dose-response of the current ISO 5349-1 measurement standard and the new suggested standard ISO/TR 18,750 with the neurosensory outcomes. This manuscript describes the study rationale, design, methods, and significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.