ReviewAnnual review of pathology2025
B Cell Responses to the Placenta and Fetus.
Review in Annual review of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Predictive value of serum β-hCG and blastocyst transfer for clinical pregnancy after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Immunoglobulins in recurrent pregnancy loss: Emerging biomarkers and therapeutic targets.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Reversing pregnancy-induced B cell sensitization to facilitate the induction of transplant tolerance in postpartum recipients.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026Article
- B-cells in breast cancer: current insights and challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Immune microenvironment dynamics in pregnant patients with concomitant autoimmune diseases: mechanisms, challenges, and clinical significance.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Pregnancy has fascinated immunologists ever since Peter Medawar's observation that reproduction runs contrary to the founding tenets of immunology. During healthy pregnancy, maternal B cells interact with antigens of the foreign conceptus (placenta and fetus) yet do not elicit rejection. Instead, robust and redundant fetomaternal tolerance pathways generally prevent maternal B cells and antibodies from harming the placenta and fetus. Fetomaternal tolerance is not absolute, and unfortunately there exist several pregnancy complications that arise from breaks therein. Here, important historic and recent developments in the field of fetomaternal tolerance pertaining to maternal B cells and antibodies are reviewed. General rules from which to conceptualize humoral tolerance to the placenta and fetus are proposed. Significant but underexplored ideas are highlighted and topics for future research are suggested, findings from which are predicted to provide insight into the fundamental nature of tolerance and bolster efforts to combat immune-mediated pregnancy complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.