ArticlePLOS digital health2024
Short-term vital parameter forecasting in the intensive care unit: A benchmark study leveraging data from patients after cardiothoracic surgery.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Benchmarking imputation methods on real-world clinical time series with simulated spatio-temporal missingness.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are closely and continuously monitored, and many machine learning (ML) solutions have been proposed to predict specific outcomes like death, bleeding, or organ failure. Forecasting of vital parameters is a more general approach to ML-based patient monitoring, but the literature on its feasibility and robust benchmarks of achievable accuracy are scarce. We implemented five univariate statistical models (the naïve model, the Theta method, exponential smoothing, the autoregressive integrated moving average model, and an autoregressive single-layer neural network), two univariate neural networks (N-BEATS and N-HiTS), and two multivariate neural networks designed for sequential data (a recurrent neural network with gated recurrent unit, GRU, and a Transformer network) to produce forecasts for six vital parameters recorded at five-minute intervals during intensive care monitoring. Vital parameters were the diastolic, systolic, and mean arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation (measured by non-invasive pulse oximetry) and heart rate, and forecasts were made for 5 through 120 minutes into the future. Patients used in this study recovered from cardiothoracic surgery in an ICU. The patient cohort used for model development (n = 22,348) and internal testing (n = 2,483) originated from a heart center in Germany, while a patient sub-set from the eICU collaborative research database, an American multicenter ICU cohort, was used for external testing (n = 7,477). The GRU was the predominant method in this study. Uni- and multivariate neural network models proved to be superior to univariate statistical models across vital parameters and forecast horizons, and their advantage steadily became more pronounced for increasing forecast horizons. With this study, we established an extensive set of benchmarks for forecast performance in the ICU. Our findings suggest that supplying physicians with short-term forecasts of vital parameters in the ICU is feasible, and that multivariate neural networks are most suited for the task due to their ability to learn patterns across thousands of patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.