ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2024
High-yield, plant-based production of an antimicrobial peptide with potent activity in a mouse model.
Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selective α-Amylase Inhibition by Plant Defensins: Structural Determinants, Engineering Strategies, and Translational Prospects.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Multivalent Display of Antimicrobial Peptides on Plant Virus Scaffolds Enhances Killing of Drug-Resistant Bacteria.ACS nano · 2026Article
- Protein engineering strategies to optimise recombinant product synthesis and accumulation in Nicotiana benthamiana.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Antimicrobial peptides: emerging next-generation strategy for sustainable plant disease management.Frontiers in antibiotics · 2026Review
- Targeted Drug Delivery Strategies in Overcoming Antimicrobial Resistance: Advances and Future Directions.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Assessing Cytotoxicity, Proteolytic Stability, and Selectivity of Antimicrobial Peptides: Implications for Orthopedic Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plants offer a promising chassis for the large-scale, cost-effective production of diverse therapeutics, including antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). However, key advances will reduce production costs, including simplifying the downstream processing and purification steps. Here, using Nicotiana benthamiana plants, we present an improved modular design that enables AMPs to be secreted via the endomembrane system and sequestered in an extracellular compartment, the apoplast. Additionally, we translationally fused an AMP to a mutated small ubiquitin-like modifier sequence, thereby enhancing peptide yield and solubilizing the peptide with minimal aggregation and reduced occurrence of necrotic lesions in the plant. This strategy resulted in substantial peptide accumulation, reaching around 2.9 mg AMP per 20 g fresh weight of leaf tissue. Furthermore, the purified AMP demonstrated low collateral toxicity in primary human skin cells, killed pathogenic bacteria by permeabilizing the membrane and exhibited anti-infective efficacy in a preclinical mouse (Mus musculus) model system, reducing bacterial loads by up to three orders of magnitude. A base-case techno-economic analysis demonstrated the economic advantages and scalability of our plant-based platform. We envision that our work can establish plants as efficient bioreactors for producing preclinical-grade AMPs at a commercial scale, with the potential for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.