ArticlePloS one2024
The final walk with preptin.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preptin, a 34-amino acid peptide derived from pro-IGF2, is believed to influence various physiological processes, including insulin secretion and the regulation of bone metabolism. Despite its recognized involvement, the precise physiological role of preptin remains enigmatic. To address this knowledge gap, we synthesized 16 analogs of preptin, spanning a spectrum from full-length forms to fragments, and conducted comprehensive comparative activity evaluations alongside native human, mouse and rat preptin. Our study aimed to elucidate the physiological role of preptin. Contrary to previous indications of broad biological activity, our thorough analyses across diverse cell types revealed no significant biological activity associated with preptin or its analogs. This suggests that the associations of preptin with various diseases or tissue-specific abundance fluctuations may be influenced by factors beyond preptin itself, such as higher levels of IGF2 or IGF2 proforms present in tissues. In conclusion, our findings challenge the conventional notion of preptin as an isolated biologically active molecule and underscore the complexity of its interactions within biological systems. Rather than acting independently, the observed effects of preptin may arise from experimental conditions, elevated preptin concentrations, or interactions with related molecules such as IGF2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.