Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39264801›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Attitudes and Behaviours Regarding COVID-19 Mitigation Strategies in Australians With an Underlying Health Condition: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Sze-Ee Soh, Darshini Ayton, Amelia Bevins, Helen Skouteris, Mallory Trent, Raina MacIntyre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sze-Ee SohDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living Research Centre, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1400-7700
Darshini AytonHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2754-2024
Amelia BevinsHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0005-2040-1957
Helen SkouterisHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Mallory TrentBiosecurity Program, The Kirby Institute, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Raina MacIntyreBiosecurity Program, The Kirby Institute, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

This research is funded by the NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence (CRE) for mitigating airborne threats to health (BREATHE) (Grant Number: RG203873).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic health strategies have focused on preventing and slowing the transmission of COVID-19 by promoting the uptake of mitigation strategies. However, little is known about the uptake of these strategies in the presence of underlying health conditions.

objectivesTo describe the attitudes and behaviours of a sample of Australians towards COVID-19 mitigation strategies, and determine if uptake of these strategies differed across different health conditions.

designCross-sectional study. SETTING AND

participantsNational survey of Australian residents over 18 years.

main outcome measuresA purpose-built survey was used to collect participants' attitudes and behaviours towards COVID-19 mitigation strategies.

resultsOver half (53%) of the 2867 participants (99% completion rate) reported having one or more comorbidities. The most commonly self-reported health condition was cardiometabolic conditions (28%). Most participants disagreed that masks were no longer needed (74%) and wanted the 5-day isolation mandate (66%). More than one-third would like masks to be mandated for indoor spaces (38%) and 25% avoided going to hospitals. Participants with allergies (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.14, 1.65), cardiometabolic (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.23, 1.79), respiratory (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.07, 1.62) and neurological (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.12, 2.32) conditions were more likely to avoid using public transport compared to those without. In contrast, participants with underlying mental health conditions were less likely to use N95/P2 facemasks in public spaces (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.25, 0.87) compared to those without.

conclusionsA substantial proportion of Australians continued to adopt COVID-19 mitigation measures or expressed a desire for more mitigations, including mandatory isolation for COVID-19, despite the lack of mandates. People with an underlying health condition who represent more than half of all adults appear to be more careful with mitigations to avoid COVID-19. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Members of the public were invited to participate in a soft launch of the survey between 4th and 5th January 2023 to test flow and functionality, and to allow the final wording of survey questions to be refined as required.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAgedAustralasian PeopleAustraliaComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMasksMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultattitudesAustraliabehavioursCOVID‐19health conditionmitigation strategies

Identifiers

PMID39264801
PMCPMC11391943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.