Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39264740›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Encoding innate ability through a genomic bottleneck.

Sergey Shuvaev, Divyansha Lachi, Alexei Koulakov, Anthony Zador

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neural rhythms as priors of speech computations.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Building the connectome of a small brain with a simple stochastic developmental generative model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. A neural manifold view of the brain.Nature neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  7. Compression-based inference of network motif sets.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Variability in Neural Circuit Formation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neuroscience Needs Network Science.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sergey ShuvaevCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724.ORCID 0000-0001-5215-8019
Divyansha LachiCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724.
Alexei KoulakovCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724.
Anthony ZadorCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724.

Funding

Eleanor Schwartz Foundation 007G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Foundation (Mathers Foundation) 007Schmidt Futures 007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals are born with extensive innate behavioral capabilities, which arise from neural circuits encoded in the genome. However, the information capacity of the genome is orders of magnitude smaller than that needed to specify the connectivity of an arbitrary brain circuit, indicating that the rules encoding circuit formation must fit through a "genomic bottleneck" as they pass from one generation to the next. Here, we formulate the problem of innate behavioral capacity in the context of artificial neural networks in terms of lossy compression of the weight matrix. We find that several standard network architectures can be compressed by several orders of magnitude, yielding pretraining performance that can approach that of the fully trained network. Interestingly, for complex but not for simple test problems, the genomic bottleneck algorithm also captures essential features of the circuit, leading to enhanced transfer learning to novel tasks and datasets. Our results suggest that compressing a neural circuit through the genomic bottleneck serves as a regularizer, enabling evolution to select simple circuits that can be readily adapted to important real-world tasks. The genomic bottleneck also suggests how innate priors can complement conventional approaches to learning in designing algorithms for AI.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsGenomeGenomicsHumansAImachine learningneural computationneural networks

Identifiers

PMID39264740
PMCPMC11420173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.