Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39264704›Full record

ReviewMicrobial genomics2024

Towards quantifying plasmid similarity.

William Matlock, Liam P Shaw, Samuel K Sheppard, Edward Feil

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Investigation of an outbreak ofMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  3. A One Health study ofMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Plasmid genomic epidemiology ofMicrobial genomics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William MatlockNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Liam P ShawDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Samuel K SheppardDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Edward FeilMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasmids are extrachromosomal replicons which can quickly spread resistance and virulence genes between clinical pathogens. From the tens of thousands of currently available plasmid sequences we know that overall plasmid diversity is structured, with related plasmids sharing a largely conserved 'backbone' of genes while being able to carry very different genetic cargo. Moreover, plasmid genomes can be structurally plastic and undergo frequent rearrangements. So, how can we quantify plasmid similarity? Answering this question requires practical efforts to sample natural variation as well as theoretical considerations of what defines a group of related plasmids. Here we consider the challenges of analysing and rationalising the current plasmid data deluge to define appropriate similarity thresholds.

Indexed as

PlasmidsBacteriaGenetic VariationPhylogenyantimicrobial resistancegenomic epidemiologymobile genetic elements

Identifiers

PMID39264704
PMCPMC11392043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.