Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39264696›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Developing and Evaluating Digital Public Health Interventions Using the Digital Public Health Framework DigiPHrame: A Framework Development Study.

Tina Jahnel, Chen-Chia Pan, Núria Pedros Barnils, Saskia Muellmann, Merle Freye, Hans-Henrik Dassow, Oliver Lange, Anke V Reinschluessel, Wolf Rogowski, Ansgar Gerhardus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A descriptive analysis of multi-jurisdictional enteric illness messaging web analytics data, 2020-2022.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Digital paradigm of public health.Frontiers in public health · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tina JahnelDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8367-4574
Chen-Chia PanLeibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2710-3259
Núria Pedros BarnilsLeibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6687-3600
Saskia MuellmannLeibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8650-8395
Merle FreyeLeibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9895-9997
Hans-Henrik DassowLeibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3586-0695
Oliver LangeLeibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9780-7334
Anke V ReinschluesselLeibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6389-6436
Wolf RogowskiLeibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1625-4171
Ansgar GerhardusLeibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3637-7419

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital public health (DiPH) interventions may help us tackle substantial public health challenges and reach historically underserved populations, in addition to presenting valuable opportunities to improve and complement existing services. However, DiPH interventions are often triggered through technological advancements and opportunities rather than public health needs. To develop and evaluate interventions designed to serve public health needs, a comprehensive framework is needed that systematically covers all aspects with relevance for public health. This includes considering the complexity of the technology, the context in which the technology is supposed to operate, its implementation, and its effects on public health, including ethical, legal, and social aspects.

objectiveWe aimed to develop such a DiPH framework with a comprehensive list of core principles to be considered throughout the development and evaluation process of any DiPH intervention.

methodsThe resulting digital public health framework (DigiPHrame) was based on a scoping review of existing digital health and public health frameworks. After extracting all assessment criteria from these frameworks, we clustered the criteria. During a series of multidisciplinary meetings with experts from the Leibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health, we restructured each domain to represent the complexity of DiPH. In this paper, we used a COVID-19 contact-tracing app as a use case to illustrate how DigiPHrame may be applied to assess DiPH interventions.

resultsThe current version of DigiPHrame consists of 182 questions nested under 12 domains. Domain 1 describes the current status of health needs and existing interventions; domains 2 and 3, the DiPH technology under assessment and aspects related to human-computer interaction, respectively; domains 4 and 5, structural and process aspects, respectively; and domains 6-12, contextual conditions and the outcomes of the DiPH intervention from broad perspectives. In the CWA use case, a number of questions relevant during its development but also important for assessors once the CWA was available were highlighted.

conclusionsDigiPHrame is a comprehensive framework for the development and assessment of digital technologies designed for public health purposes. It is a living framework and will, therefore, be updated regularly and as new public health needs and technological advancements emerge.

Indexed as

COVID-19Public HealthHumansTelemedicinecontact tracingcontact-tracing appCOVID-19developmentDigiPHramedigital healthdigital public healthdigital public health frameworkDiPHevaluationframeworkguidanceimplementationinterventionopportunityprogram evaluationpublic healthscoping reviewtechnological advancementtechnologytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39264696
PMCPMC11427851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.