ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Prediction of Axial Length From Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Model.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of artificial intelligence in optical coherence tomography in myopia and pathological myopia.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning model for predicting the axial length (AL) of eyes using optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Methods: We retrospectively included patients with AL measurements and OCT images taken within 3 months. We utilized a 5-fold cross-validation with the ResNet-152 architecture, incorporating horizontal OCT images, vertical OCT images, and dual-input images. The mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared (R2), and the percentages of eyes within error ranges of ±1.0, ±2.0, and ±3.0 mm were calculated. Results: A total of 9064 eyes of 5349 patients (total image number of 18,128) were included. The average AL of the eyes was 24.35 ± 2.03 (range = 20.53-37.07). Utilizing horizontal and vertical OCT images as dual inputs, deep learning models predicted AL with MAE and R2 of 0.592 mm and 0.847 mm, respectively, in the internal test set (1824 eyes of 1070 patients). In the external test set (171 eyes of 123 patients), the deep learning models predicted AL with MAE and R2 of 0.556 mm and 0.663 mm, respectively. Regarding error margins of ±1.0, ±2.0, and ±3.0 mm, the dual-input models showed accuracies of 83.50%, 98.14%, and 99.45%, respectively, in the internal test set, and 85.38%, 99.42%, and 100.00%, respectively, in the external test set. Conclusions: A deep learning-based model accurately predicts AL from OCT images. The dual-input model showed the best performance, demonstrating the potential of macular OCT images in AL prediction. Translational Relevance: The study provides new insights into the relationship between retinal and choroidal structures and AL elongation using artificial intelligence models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.