ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2025
Post-contrast acute kidney injury in the super-elder patients: a CT-scan perspective.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Percutaneous thermal ablation for renal cell carcinoma: a comprehensive review of current evidence and future directions.La Radiologia medica · 2026Review
- Percutaneous thermal ablation for renal cell carcinoma: a comprehensive review of current evidence and future directions.La Radiologia medica · 2026Review
- Advances in renal cancer: diagnosis, treatment, and emerging technologies.La Radiologia medica · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe administration of intravenous (IV) contrast media during computed tomography (CT) examinations is essential to enhance diagnostic accuracy in various clinical scenarios. Traditionally, older age is considered a risk factor for the development of post-contrast Acute Kidney Injury (PC-AKI); however, there is limited information available for the super-elderly population (aged ≥ 85). This study aims to investigate the incidence and risk factors associated with PC-AKI in individuals aged 85 and older undergoing CT scans with IV contrast.
methodsA retrospective cohort study, including all hospitalized patients aged 85 or older who underwent CT scans between the years 2005 and 2021. Patients were categorized into IV contrast and non-IV contrast groups. Baseline demographic and clinical data, along with kidney function parameters, were collected.
resultsThe final cohort included 7,078 patients who underwent CT scans, with 40% receiving IV contrast. The overall AKI occurrence within 72 h post-CT was 5.72%, slightly elevated in the non-IV contrast group (6.25% vs. 4.94%, p = 0.02). However, multivariate analysis revealed no significant difference between the groups (OR 1, CI 0.8-1.2, p = 0.92), even after stratifying by kidney function. A secondary analysis, using a less strict AKI definition, supported these findings. Baseline creatinine levels emerged as prominent risk factor associated with PC- AKI.
conclusionThe current study provides reassurance regarding the safety of contrast-enhanced CT scans in super-elderly patients, particularly those with baseline normal to mild kidney dysfunction. These findings may contribute to the ongoing discussion on the risk-benefit balance of contrast-enhanced CT scans in the super-elderly population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39264543What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.