Observational studyHeart and vessels2024
Health insurance and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure in Latin America: an observational study of the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA).
Observational study in Heart and vessels, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of heart rate variability indices from ballistocardiogram and electrocardiogram: a study on measurement agreement.Heart and vessels · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effect of the health insurance type on the prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients in Colombia and Latin America is poorly known. We aimed to analyze the characteristics of HF patients that participated in the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA) as stated by their health insurance type and their relationship with the immediate prognosis of these patients. Patients with HF diagnosis were included in the RECOLFACA registry between 2017-2019. The registry was conducted in 60 centers in Colombia. All-cause mortality was the principal outcome. To evaluate the impact of health insurance on mortality, a Cox proportional hazards regression model was used. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare survival probabilities according to insurance type. All statistical analyses were two-tailed and were considered significant with a p value < 0.05. Of the 2,528 participants enrolled in the registry, 99% held details about their health insurance. Of those, 897 patients (35.6%) were covered by public insurance. These patients were significantly younger, with a lower proportion of men, more frequently from rural origin, and lower prevalence of most comorbidities (omitting hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and Chagas disease) than those with private insurance. Furthermore, patients with public insurance had a worse functional class, as well as a poorer quality of life, and lower frequency of use of implantable devices, while exhibiting similar prescription rates of triple medical therapy for HF. Finally, no differences in short-term mortality were observed between the two groups (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.79, 1.51). The type of health insurance represents a condition related with relevant differences in the profile of patients with HF in Colombia. Despite this, no significant differences were detected in the short-term prognosis of these patients based on the type of health insurance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39264429What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.