Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39264405›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2024

Bioactivity of Amphidinol-Containing Extracts of Amphidinium carterae Grown Under Varying Cultivation Conditions.

Maria Elena Barone, Elliot Murphy, David Fierli, Floriana Campanile, Gerard T A Fleming, Olivier P Thomas, Nicolas Touzet

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bioactive Polyketides fromMarine drugs · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Elena BaroneDepartment of Environmental Science, Centre for Environmental Research, Sustainability and Innovation, School of Science, Atlantic Technological University Sligo, Ash Ln, Ballytivnan, Sligo, F91 YW50, Ireland. eln.barone@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8240-9464
Elliot MurphySchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Ryan Institute, University of Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland.
David FierliSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, George Washington University, 800 22Nd St NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Floriana CampanileDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Medical Molecular Microbiology and Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory (MMARLab), University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia N. 97, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Gerard T A FlemingSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Ryan Institute, University of Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland.
Olivier P ThomasSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Ryan Institute, University of Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland.
Nicolas TouzetDepartment of Environmental Science, Centre for Environmental Research, Sustainability and Innovation, School of Science, Atlantic Technological University Sligo, Ash Ln, Ballytivnan, Sligo, F91 YW50, Ireland.

Funding

VES4us No 801338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microalgae are of great interest due to their ability to produce valuable compounds, such as pigments, omega-3 fatty acids, antioxidants, and antimicrobials. The dinoflagellate genus Amphidinium is particularly notable for its amphidinol-like compounds, which exhibit antibacterial and antifungal properties. This study utilized a two-stage cultivation method to grow Amphidinium carterae CCAP 1102/8 under varying conditions, such as blue LED light, increased salinity, and the addition of sodium carbonate or hydrogen peroxide. After cultivation, the biomass was extracted and fractionated using solid-phase extraction, yielding six fractions per treatment. These fractions were analyzed using Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS) to identify their chemical components. Key amphidinol compounds (AM-B, AM-C, AM-22, and AM-A) were identified, with AM-B being the most abundant in Fraction 4, followed by AM-C. Fraction 5 also contained a significant amount of AM-C along with an unknown compound. Fraction 4 returned the highest antimicrobial activity against the pathogens Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Candida albicans, with Minimal Biocidal Concentrations (MBCs) ranging from 1 to 512 µg/mL. Results indicate that the modulation of both amphidinol profile and fraction bioactivity can be induced by adjusting the cultivation parameters used to grow two-stage batch cultures of A. carterae.

Indexed as

Candida albicansDinoflagellidaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAmphidinolsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsChromatography, LiquidEnterococcus faecalisStaphylococcus aureusAmphidinolsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.