ArticleCurrent microbiology2024
Bioactivity of Amphidinol-Containing Extracts of Amphidinium carterae Grown Under Varying Cultivation Conditions.
Article in Current microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Content, Ratio and Productivity of Amphidinols in Wild-Type and Mutagenized Strains ofMarine drugs · 2026Article
- Bioactive Polyketides fromMarine drugs · 2025Review
- Untargeted Metabolomic Analysis and Cytotoxicity of Extracts of the Marine DinoflagellateToxins · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microalgae are of great interest due to their ability to produce valuable compounds, such as pigments, omega-3 fatty acids, antioxidants, and antimicrobials. The dinoflagellate genus Amphidinium is particularly notable for its amphidinol-like compounds, which exhibit antibacterial and antifungal properties. This study utilized a two-stage cultivation method to grow Amphidinium carterae CCAP 1102/8 under varying conditions, such as blue LED light, increased salinity, and the addition of sodium carbonate or hydrogen peroxide. After cultivation, the biomass was extracted and fractionated using solid-phase extraction, yielding six fractions per treatment. These fractions were analyzed using Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS) to identify their chemical components. Key amphidinol compounds (AM-B, AM-C, AM-22, and AM-A) were identified, with AM-B being the most abundant in Fraction 4, followed by AM-C. Fraction 5 also contained a significant amount of AM-C along with an unknown compound. Fraction 4 returned the highest antimicrobial activity against the pathogens Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Candida albicans, with Minimal Biocidal Concentrations (MBCs) ranging from 1 to 512 µg/mL. Results indicate that the modulation of both amphidinol profile and fraction bioactivity can be induced by adjusting the cultivation parameters used to grow two-stage batch cultures of A. carterae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39264405What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.