ArticleDermatology and therapy2024
Cutaneous Manifestations in Patients with Dermatomyositis, Are They Only Skin Deep?
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microdroplet-Engineered Skeletal Muscle Organoids from Primary Tissue Recapitulate Parental Physiology with High Reproducibility.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Drug-induced dermatomyositis: a pharmacovigilance study of the FDA adverse event reporting system.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDermatomyositis (DM) is a rare and severely debilitating autoimmune disease that can affect children and adults; however, there is little understanding of the patient-reported experience and uncertainty around validated clinical outcomes assessments (COAs) that could measure changes in the condition during clinical trials of new treatments.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to understand the patient experience of DM, with a focus on its cutaneous manifestations, to describe the patient experience and determine the suitability of existing COA measures.
methodsAdult (≥ 18 years) patients (N = 28) with severe active cutaneous manifestations of DM were interviewed. In the 90-min interviews, open-ended questions and probes were used to elicit descriptions of key clinical manifestations and patients' experiences of DM, including the symptoms and impacts on their daily lives and wellbeing.
resultsPatients reported 13 different skin manifestations of DM. The most common were rash (n = 28, 100%), itch (n = 28, 100%), dry skin (n = 23, 82%), and swelling of the skin (n = 17, 61%). The head and face, followed by hands, were perceived as the most bothersome body areas affected by skin manifestations, because they are exposed and visible to themselves and other people. All patients (n = 28, 100%) reported at least one impact of DM, which varied greatly between patients, but included emotional, psychological, cognitive, and physical impacts, and those affecting daily life, such as work and sleep. Over half of the patients (n = 19, 67%) reported that their daily activities were impacted by DM.
conclusionsThe qualitative interviews with patients revealed that the presentation of DM manifestations is highly variable but affects patients' emotional wellbeing, physical activities, and daily life significantly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.