ArticleProteins2025
In Silico Screening, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Binding Free Energy Identify Single-Point Mutations That Destabilize p53 and Reduce Binding to DNA.
Article in Proteins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted biologics for TNBC: Advances in nanobodies, antibodies, peptides, and aptamers.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Considering p53's pivotal role as a tumor suppressor protein, proactive identification and characterization of potentially harmful p53 mutations are crucial before they appear in the population. To address this, four computational prediction tools-SIFT, Polyphen-2, PhD-SNP, and MutPred2-utilizing sequence-based and machine-learning algorithms, were employed to identify potentially deleterious p53 nsSNPs (nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms) that may impact p53 structure, dynamics, and binding with DNA. These computational methods identified three variants, namely, C141Y, C238S, and L265P, as detrimental to p53 stability. Furthermore, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations revealed that all three variants exhibited heightened structural flexibility compared to the native protein, especially the C141Y and L265P mutations. Consequently, due to the altered structure of mutant p53, the DNA-binding affinity of all three variants decreased by approximately 1.8 to 9.7 times compared to wild-type p53 binding with DNA (14 μM). Notably, the L265P mutation exhibited an approximately ten-fold greater reduction in binding affinity. Consequently, the presence of the L265P mutation in p53 could pose a substantial risk to humans. Given that p53 regulates abnormal tumor growth, this research carries significant implications for surveillance efforts and the development of anticancer therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.