ArticleExperimental physiology2024
Measurement of respiratory-swallowing coordination using an oronasal facemask in healthy individuals.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory-swallow coordination training using bimodal signal biofeedback for patients with post-stroke dysphagia: a randomized controlled trial.Annals of medicine · 2026Trial
- Respiratory and non-respiratory airflow characteristics across ingestive and non-ingestive swallowing tasks.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Measurement of respiratory-swallowing coordination using an oronasal facemask in healthy individuals.Experimental physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory-swallowing coordination (RSC) is well established as an essential airway-protective mechanism. Previous studies have used nasal airflow and/or kinematic rib cage and abdominal measures to assess respiration surrounding swallowing, meaning that the direct influence of oral respiration on RSC remains unknown. This study used a partitioned oronasal facemask to compare respiratory phase patterns measured using isolated nasal airflow with those measured using combined oronasal airflow during non-ingestive and ingestive swallowing tasks. Twenty-four healthy individuals with no respiratory or swallowing disorders were assessed at rest and during cued dry, 10 mL water, continuous drinking and cracker swallowing tasks. Respiratory phase patterns were determined for discrete swallows using the nasal and combined oronasal channels separately. There was variable agreement between respiratory phase patterns according to the nasal and oronasal channels across swallowing conditions. The frequency of exhale-swallow-exhale, inhale-swallow-exhale and exhale-swallow-inhale patterns increased by 2%-3% each with the addition of oral flow data to nasal data, whereas the prevalence of inhale-swallow-inhale and ambiguous patterns decreased. This suggests that estimates of respiratory phase patterns are altered minimally by inclusion of oral respiratory estimates in a healthy sample. There were several additional findings of note, including lower within-participant, within-session trial consistency (test-retest reliability) than expected, suggesting high variability in respiratory phase patterns across trials. Additionally, data showed evidence of swallowing non-respiratory flow at the beginning and end of the respiratory-swallowing pause, moving in both inward and outward directions, potentially expanding current understanding of swallowing non-respiratory flow. Further in-depth physiological investigations are required to improve understanding of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.