Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39263741›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2026

Informing Decision-making for Transected Margin Reresection in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-derived Pancreatic Cancer: An International Multicenter Study.

Joseph R Habib, Ingmar F Rompen, Benedict Kinny-Köster, Brady A Campbell, Paul C M Andel, Greg D Sacks, Adrian T Billeter, Hjalmar C van Santvoort, Lois A Daamen, Ammar A Javed and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Pancreatic Cancer Frequently Infiltrates the TRIANGLE Compartment: A Surgical Option to Prevent Local Recurrence.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Joseph R HabibDepartment of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-3445-2278
Ingmar F RompenDepartment of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
Benedict Kinny-KösterDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Brady A CampbellDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Paul C M AndelDepartment of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
Greg D SacksDepartment of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
Adrian T BilleterClarunis University Digestive Health Care Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Hjalmar C van SantvoortDepartment of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lois A DaamenDepartment of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ammar A JavedDepartment of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
Beat P Müller-StichClarunis University Digestive Health Care Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Marc G BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Markus W BüchlerDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Jin HeDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Christopher L WolfgangDepartment of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
I Quintus MolenaarDepartment of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martin LoosDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the prognostic impact of margin status in patients with resected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN)-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and to inform future intraoperative decision-making on handling differing degrees of dysplasia on frozen section.

backgroundThe ideal oncologic surgical outcome is a negative transection margin with normal pancreatic epithelium left behind. However, the prognostic significance of reresecting certain degrees of dysplasia or invasive cancer at the pancreatic neck margin during pancreatectomy for IPMN-derived PDAC is debatable.

methodsConsecutive patients with resected and histologically confirmed IPMN-derived PDAC (2002-2022) from 6 international high-volume centers were included. The prognostic relevance of a positive resection margin (R1) and degrees of dysplasia at the pancreatic neck margin were assessed by log-rank test and multivariable Cox-regression for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival.

resultsOverall, 832 patients with IPMN-derived PDAC were included, with 322 patients (39%) having an R1-resection on final pathology. Median OS (mOS) was significantly longer in patients with an R0 status compared with those with an R1 status (65.8 vs 26.3 mo P <0.001). Patients without dysplasia at the pancreatic neck margin had similar OS compared with those with low-grade dysplasia (mOS: 78.8 vs 66.8 mo, P =0.344). However, high-grade dysplasia (mOS: 26.1 mo, P =0.001) and invasive cancer (mOS: 25.0 mo, P <0.001) were associated with significantly worse OS compared with no or low-grade dysplasia. Patients who underwent conversion of high-risk margins (high-grade or invasive cancer) to a low-risk margin (low-grade or no dysplasia) after intraoperative frozen section had significantly superior OS compared with those with a high-risk neck margin on final pathology (mOS: 76.9 vs 26.1 mo P <0.001).

conclusionsIn IPMN-derived PDAC, normal epithelium or low-grade dysplasia at the neck have similar outcomes, while pancreatic neck margins with high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer are associated with poorer outcomes. Conversion of a high-risk to low-risk margin after intraoperative frozen section is associated with survival benefit and should be performed when feasible.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, MucinousCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalClinical Decision-MakingMargins of ExcisionPancreatectomyPancreatic Intraductal NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFrozen SectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective Studiesdysplasiaintraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmmarginpancreatic cancerpancreatic cystpancreatic neoplasmsR1

Identifiers

PMID39263741
PMCPMC13218440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.