Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39263737›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of laryngology and otology2024

Psychological aspects of vestibular disorders: a national survey of clinical practice.

Laura J Smith, Wesley Pyke, David Wilkinson, Emma Travers-Hill, S S Surenthiran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of laryngology and otology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura J SmithSchool of Psychology, Keynes College, University of Kent, Kent, CT2 7NP, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3275-1530
Wesley PykeSchool of Psychology, Keynes College, University of Kent, Kent, CT2 7NP, UK.
David WilkinsonSchool of Psychology, Keynes College, University of Kent, Kent, CT2 7NP, UK.
Emma Travers-HillSchool of Psychology, Keynes College, University of Kent, Kent, CT2 7NP, UK.
S S SurenthiranThe London Neuro-otology Centre, London, W1 G 6JL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examines how psychological aspects of vestibular disorders are currently addressed highlighting any national variation.

methodAn online survey was completed by 101 UK healthcare professionals treating vestibular disorders. The survey covered service configurations, attitudes towards psychological aspects and current clinical practice.

resultsNinety-six per cent of respondents thought there was a psychological component to vestibular disorders. There was a discrepancy between perceived importance of addressing psychological aspects and low confidence to undertake this. Those with more experience felt more confident addressing psychological aspects. History taking and questionnaires containing one or two psychological items were the most common assessment approaches. Discussing symptoms and signposting were the most frequent management approaches. Qualitative responses highlighted the interdependence of psychological and vestibular disorders which require timely intervention. Barriers included limited referral pathways, resources and interdisciplinary expertise.

conclusionAlthough psychological distress is frequently identified, suitable psychological treatment is not routinely offered in the UK.

Indexed as

Vestibular DiseasesAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMedical History TakingPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomcognitionmental healthoutcome assessmenttherapeuticsvestibular diseases

Identifiers

PMID39263737
PMCPMC11518673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.