Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39263676›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Point-based risk score for the risk stratification and prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma: a population-based random survival forest modeling study.

Zhenqiu Liu, Huangbo Yuan, Chen Suo, Renjia Zhao, Li Jin, Xuehong Zhang, Tiejun Zhang, Xingdong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhenqiu LiuState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Huangbo YuanState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chen SuoFudan University Taizhou Institute of Health Sciences, Taizhou, China.
Renjia ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Li JinState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xuehong ZhangChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Tiejun ZhangFudan University Taizhou Institute of Health Sciences, Taizhou, China.
Xingdong ChenState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The precise associations between common clinical biomarkers and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk remain unclear but hold valuable insights for HCC risk stratification and prediction. Methods: We examined the linear and nonlinear associations between the baseline levels of 32 circulating biomarkers and HCC risk in the England cohort of UK Biobank (UKBB) (n = 397,702). The participants were enrolled between 2006 and 2010 and followed up to 31st October 2022. The primary outcome is incident HCC cases. We then employed random survival forests (RSF) to select the top ten most informative biomarkers, considering their association with HCC, and developed a point-based risk score to predict HCC. The performance of the risk score was evaluated in three validation sets including UKBB Scotland and Wales cohort (n = 52,721), UKBB non-White-British cohort (n = 29,315), and the Taizhou Longitudinal Study in China (n = 17,269). Findings: Twenty-five biomarkers were significantly associated with HCC risk, either linearly or nonlinearly. Based on the RSF model selected biomarkers, our point-based risk score showed a concordance index of 0.866 in the England cohort and varied between 0.814 and 0.849 in the three validation sets. HCC incidence rates ranged from 0.95 to 30.82 per 100,000 from the lowest to the highest quintiles of the risk score in the England cohort. Individuals in the highest risk quintile had a 32-73 times greater risk of HCC compared to those in the lowest quintile. Moreover, over 70% of HCC cases were detected in individuals within the top risk score quintile across all cohorts. Interpretation: Our simple risk score enables the identification of high-risk individuals of HCC in the general population. However, including some biomarkers, such as insulin-like growth factor 1, not routinely measured in clinical practice may increase the model's complexity, highlighting the need for more accessible biomarkers that can maintain or improve the predictive accuracy of the risk score. Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 82204125) and the Science and Technology Support Program of Taizhou (TS202224).

Indexed as

Cohort studyCommon clinical biomarkersHCCNonlinear correlationPoint-based scoring system

Identifiers

PMID39263676
PMCPMC11388332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.