ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Point-based risk score for the risk stratification and prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma: a population-based random survival forest modeling study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liver-specific phenotypic aging, behavior and genetic risks, and long-term liver-related outcomes.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Predicts Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk from Routine Clinical Data: A Large Population-Based Multicentric Study.Cancer discovery · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a clinically interpretable risk scoring system for predicting one-year all-cause mortality in esophageal cancer: a population-based study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Translating Fibrosis to Malignancy: Biomarkers and Therapeutic Opportunities in Liver Fibrosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Liver cancer risk stratification using deep learning on nationwide longitudinal health screening data: a retrospective cohort study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Multimodal risk profiles reveal shared and disease-specific risks of major non-communicable diseases: a prospective cohort study of 42,666 individuals.International journal of public health · 2026Article
- Prognostic Relevance of Neddylation-Related Genes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Big Data Analytics in Large Cohorts: Opportunities and Challenges for Research in Hepatology.Seminars in liver disease · 2025Review
- Development and validation of an integrative 54 biomarker-based risk identification model for multi-cancer in 42,666 individuals: a population-based prospective study to guide advanced screening strategies.Biomarker research · 2025Article
- An Interpretable Machine Learning Model Based on Inflammatory-Nutritional Biomarkers for Predicting Metachronous Liver Metastases After Colorectal Cancer Surgery.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-based evaluation of prognostic benefits from immunotherapy plus targeted therapy with or without radiotherapy or TACE in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The precise associations between common clinical biomarkers and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk remain unclear but hold valuable insights for HCC risk stratification and prediction. Methods: We examined the linear and nonlinear associations between the baseline levels of 32 circulating biomarkers and HCC risk in the England cohort of UK Biobank (UKBB) (n = 397,702). The participants were enrolled between 2006 and 2010 and followed up to 31st October 2022. The primary outcome is incident HCC cases. We then employed random survival forests (RSF) to select the top ten most informative biomarkers, considering their association with HCC, and developed a point-based risk score to predict HCC. The performance of the risk score was evaluated in three validation sets including UKBB Scotland and Wales cohort (n = 52,721), UKBB non-White-British cohort (n = 29,315), and the Taizhou Longitudinal Study in China (n = 17,269). Findings: Twenty-five biomarkers were significantly associated with HCC risk, either linearly or nonlinearly. Based on the RSF model selected biomarkers, our point-based risk score showed a concordance index of 0.866 in the England cohort and varied between 0.814 and 0.849 in the three validation sets. HCC incidence rates ranged from 0.95 to 30.82 per 100,000 from the lowest to the highest quintiles of the risk score in the England cohort. Individuals in the highest risk quintile had a 32-73 times greater risk of HCC compared to those in the lowest quintile. Moreover, over 70% of HCC cases were detected in individuals within the top risk score quintile across all cohorts. Interpretation: Our simple risk score enables the identification of high-risk individuals of HCC in the general population. However, including some biomarkers, such as insulin-like growth factor 1, not routinely measured in clinical practice may increase the model's complexity, highlighting the need for more accessible biomarkers that can maintain or improve the predictive accuracy of the risk score. Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 82204125) and the Science and Technology Support Program of Taizhou (TS202224).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.