Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39263637›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2024

Six and twelve-month respiratory outcomes in a cohort of severe and critical COVID-19 survivors: A prospective monocentric study in Latin America.

Liliana Fernández-Trujillo, Juan Sebastián Galindo-Sánchez, Angie Cediel, Carlos A García, Eliana I Morales, Jessica Largo, María A Amezquita-Dussan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liliana Fernández-TrujilloDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pulmonology Service, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0789-9154
Juan Sebastián Galindo-SánchezClinical Research Center, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Angie CedielDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Carlos A GarcíaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Eliana I MoralesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pulmonology Service, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Jessica LargoClinical Research Center, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2982-4498
María A Amezquita-DussanClinical Research Center, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Severe COVID-19 can result in long-term sequelae known as "chronic COVID," characterized by a wide range of persistent physical and mental symptoms. Chest imaging and pulmonary function test alterations have been observed in recovered patients. Most studies focus on up to a 3-month follow-up after symptom onset or hospital discharge, with few reports on long-term follow-up and limited evidence regarding disease progression in Latin America. Methods: This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics and changes in pulmonary function, imaging, and quality of life in severe and critical COVID-19 patients requiring ICU admission in a high-complexity hospital in Latin America. A prospective cohort of survivors underwent clinical, radiological, pulmonary function, and quality of life assessments 6 and 12 months post-discharge. Results: One hundred twelve patients were included, all of whom attended the 6-month follow-up, and 99 returned for the 12-month follow-up. Most subjects had no previous respiratory symptoms or significant medical history. At the end of the follow-up period, 74% of the patients showed interstitial infiltrates in chest tomography and a higher frequency of fibroatelectatic tracts and parenchymal bands. Pulmonary function tests returned to normal ranges, except for carbon monoxide diffusion, but no altered scores were reported in the questionnaires. Conclusion: Despite residual radiological findings, most parameters studied in severe and critical COVID-19 survivors improved over the 12-month follow-up period. Regardless of the imaging abnormalities, the improvement in variables such as symptomatic relief and normal pulmonary function suggests that these alterations are transient. Carbon monoxide diffusion did not normalize by the end of the follow-up, which is consistent with the abnormalities reported in multiple studies, indicating a potential disease-related pattern.

Indexed as

COVID-19follow-up studypulmonary function testsSARS-CoV-2tomographyX-ray

Identifiers

PMID39263637
PMCPMC11388297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.