Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39263593›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2024

Auto-LIA: The Automated Vision-Based Leaf Inclination Angle Measurement System Improves Monitoring of Plant Physiology.

Sijun Jiang, Xingcai Wu, Qi Wang, Zhixun Pei, Yuxiang Wang, Jian Jin, Ying Guo, RunJiang Song, Liansheng Zang, Yong-Jin Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sijun JiangState Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.
Xingcai WuState Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.
Qi WangState Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6269-0196
Zhixun PeiState Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.
Yuxiang WangState Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.
Jian JinDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Ying GuoSchool of Information Science, North China University of Technology, Beijing, China.
RunJiang SongNational Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.
Liansheng ZangNational Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.
Yong-Jin LiuDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Gefei HaoNational Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant sensors are commonly used in agricultural production, landscaping, and other fields to monitor plant growth and environmental parameters. As an important basic parameter in plant monitoring, leaf inclination angle (LIA) not only influences light absorption and pesticide loss but also contributes to genetic analysis and other plant phenotypic data collection. The measurements of LIA provide a basis for crop research as well as agricultural management, such as water loss, pesticide absorption, and illumination radiation. On the one hand, existing efficient solutions, represented by light detection and ranging (LiDAR), can provide the average leaf angle distribution of a plot. On the other hand, the labor-intensive schemes represented by hand measurements can show high accuracy. However, the existing methods suffer from low automation and weak leaf-plant correlation, limiting the application of individual plant leaf phenotypes. To improve the efficiency of LIA measurement and provide the correlation between leaf and plant, we design an image-phenotype-based noninvasive and efficient optical sensor measurement system, which combines multi-processes implemented via computer vision technologies and RGB images collected by physical sensing devices. Specifically, we utilize object detection to associate leaves with plants and adopt 3-dimensional reconstruction techniques to recover the spatial information of leaves in computational space. Then, we propose a spatial continuity-based segmentation algorithm combined with a graphical operation to implement the extraction of leaf key points. Finally, we seek the connection between the computational space and the actual physical space and put forward a method of leaf transformation to realize the localization and recovery of the LIA in physical space. Overall, our solution is characterized by noninvasiveness, full-process automation, and strong leaf-plant correlation, which enables efficient measurements at low cost. In this study, we validate Auto-LIA for practicality and compare the accuracy with the best solution that is acquired with an expensive and invasive LiDAR device. Our solution demonstrates its competitiveness and usability at a much lower equipment cost, with an accuracy of only 2. 5° less than that of the widely used LiDAR. As an intelligent processing system for plant sensor signals, Auto-LIA provides fully automated measurement of LIA, improving the monitoring of plant physiological information for plant protection. We make our code and data publicly available at http://autolia.samlab.cn.

Identifiers

PMID39263593
PMCPMC11387749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.