Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39263591›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024

Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of Supplementary Parenteral Nutrition in ICU Patients.

Deying Xiao, Long Xie, Wenhong Lin, Jinhua Fu, Lin Deng, Qian Zhuang, Maobai Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Deying Xiao *Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, 364000, People's Republic of China.
Long Xie *Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, 364000, People's Republic of China.
Wenhong LinLongyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, 364000, People's Republic of China.
Jinhua FuLongyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, 364000, People's Republic of China.
Lin DengLongyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, 364000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0006-9101-0686
Qian ZhuangThe School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350004, People's Republic of China.
Maobai LiuThe School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350004, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This evaluation aims to provide a reference for clinical decision-making regarding the use of SPN in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate the quality of clinical practice guidelines for the use of supplementary parenteral nutrition (SPN) in ICU patients, both domestically and internationally. Patients and Methods: The quality of clinical practice recommendations for SPN use in ICU patients was assessed using a systematic approach. Results: Five nutrition recommendations in total were included for analysis. The average standardized scores for the recommendations across the six domains of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) are as follows: Scope and purpose scored 87.96%, stakeholder Involvement scored 68.52%, rigour of development scored 73.40%, clarity of presentation scored 84.80%, applicability scored 64.72%, and editorial independence scored 91.10%. In the comprehensive evaluation, two guidelines were rated as grade A recommendations, and three were rated as grade B recommendations. Most guidelines recommended against early use of SPN when energy and protein requirements could not be met solely through enteral nutrition (EN) in ICU patients. The guidelines emphasized achieving target energy levels and discontinuing parenteral nutrition (PN) as soon as the energy requirements were met to prevent overfeeding. Conclusion: This study utilized the AGREE II scale to assess the quality of five nutrition guidelines. All 5 guidelines were deemed acceptable Recommendations include focusing on participants, rigour, and applicability to enhance guideline quality. Clinicians should exercise professional judgment when applying guidelines as they complement training and judgment, rather than replacing them.

Indexed as

clinical practice guidelinesguideline evaluationICUpatientssupplementary parenteral nutrition

Identifiers

PMID39263591
PMCPMC11389716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.