ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of vancomycin-related acute kidney injury in critical care patients.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linear dose-response relationship between vancomycin trough concentration and acute kidney injury in sepsis: effect modification by hyperlactatemia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Anti-Infective-Associated AKI: A Narrative Review of the Epidemiology, Mechanisms, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Clinical Course, Monitoring, Prevention, and Therapeutic Strategies.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Drug Toxicity Prediction: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Toxics · 2025Review
- PK/PD-Guided Strategies for Appropriate Antibiotic Use in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Construction and Validation of a Nomogram-Based Predictive Model for Acute Kidney Injury Caused by Drug Resistance to Tuberculosis.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) leads to underestimated morbidity in the intensive care unit (ICU). It is significantly important to predict its occurrence in advance. However, risk factors and nomograms to predict this AKI are limited. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of two databases. A total of 1,959 patients diagnosed with AKI and treated with vancomycin were enrolled from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. According to the 7:3 ratio, the training set (n = 1,372) and the internal validation set (n = 587) were randomly allocated. The external validation set included 211 patients from the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU). Next, to screen potential variables, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was utilized. Subsequently, the nomogram was developed by the variables of the selected results in the multivariable logistic regression. Finally, discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated to validate the nomogram. Results: The constructed nomogram showed fine discrimination in the training set (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.791; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.758-0.823), internal validation set (AUC = 0.793; 95% CI: 0.742-0.844), and external validation set (AUC = 0.755; 95% CI: 0.663-0.847). Moreover, it also well demonstrated calibration and clinical utility. The significant improvement ( Conclusion: This established nomogram indicated promising performance in determining individual AKI risk of vancomycin-treated critical care patients, which will be beneficial in making clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.