Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39263563›Full record

ReviewJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health2024

Noninvasive Technologies for the Diagnosis of Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Carina Nogueira Garcia, Christoph Wies, Katja Hauser, Titus J Brinker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carina Nogueira GarciaDigital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph WiesDigital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Katja HauserDigital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Titus J BrinkerDigital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) diagnosis is essential to initiate adequate targeted treatment. Noninvasive diagnostic technologies could overcome the need of multiple biopsies and reduce tumor recurrence. To assess performance of noninvasive technologies for cSCC diagnostics, 947 relevant records were identified through a systematic literature search. Among the 15 selected studies within this systematic review, 7 were included in the meta-analysis, comprising of 1144 patients, 224 cSCC lesions, and 1729 clinical diagnoses. Overall, the sensitivity values are 92% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 86.6-96.4%) for high-frequency ultrasound, 75% (95% CI = 65.7-86.2%) for optical coherence tomography, and 63% (95% CI = 51.3-69.1%) for reflectance confocal microscopy. The overall specificity values are 88% (95% CI = 82.7-92.5%), 95% (95% CI = 92.7-97.3%), and 96% (95% CI = 94.8-97.4%), respectively. Physician's expertise is key for high diagnostic performance of investigated devices. This can be justified by the provision of additional tissue information, which requires physician interpretation, despite insufficient standardized diagnostic criteria. Furthermore, few deep learning studies were identified. Thus, integration of deep learning into the investigated devices is a potential investigating field in cSCC diagnosis.

Indexed as

Confocal microscopyKeratinocyte tumorNoninvasiveOptical coherence tomographySquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39263563
PMCPMC11388704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.