ArticleRadiology case reports2024
AI algorithmically-enhanced motion suppression simulating an osteochondral defect in a young child.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology has rapidly increased in our field and stands to allow more accurate diagnosis, quicker interpretations, easier workflows, and improved image quality. However, with superior image quality produced with the help of AI algorithms, one could begin to discount or even eliminate the review of nonalgorithmic enhanced images. At least currently, these images remain important. This case report demonstrates a unique anomaly simulating disease resulting from AI-enhanced motion suppression. On the original images, patient motion and an atypical linear motion artifact is obvious. However, the images reproduced using our AI motion artifact suppression algorithm suppressed nearly all (but not all) of the motion artifact resulting in what appeared to be an osteochondral lesion in a child's knee. This case illustrates the necessity for the interpreting radiologist to review both original acquisitions as well as AI-enhanced images, at least for the time being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.