Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39263452›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Comparative venom analysis between melanistic and normally coloured phenotypes of the common adder (

Lennart Schulte, Lilien Uhrig, Johanna Eichberg, Michael Schwartze, Ingve Auth, Miriam Schulz, Thomas Lindner, Paul Hien, Kornelia Hardes, Andreas Vilcinskas and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lennart SchulteInstitute for Insect Biotechnology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Faculty 09 Agricultural Sciences, Nutritional Sciences and Environmental Management, Giessen, Hessen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5260-9797
Lilien UhrigDepartment of Biodiversity Research, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME Branch for Bioresources, Gießen, Hessen, Germany.
Johanna EichbergDepartment of Biodiversity Research, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME Branch for Bioresources, Gießen, Hessen, Germany.
Michael SchwartzeInstitute for Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Munster, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.
Ingve AuthInstitute for Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Munster, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.
Miriam SchulzInstitute for Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Munster, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.
Thomas LindnerInstitute for Zoology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Bayern, Germany.
Paul HienVenture for Interconnection, Protection, Education and Research in Adders (VIPERA) e.V., Velburg, Bavaria, Germany.
Kornelia HardesDepartment of Biodiversity Research, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME Branch for Bioresources, Gießen, Hessen, Germany.
Andreas VilcinskasInstitute for Insect Biotechnology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Faculty 09 Agricultural Sciences, Nutritional Sciences and Environmental Management, Giessen, Hessen, Germany.
Tim LüddeckeDepartment of Biodiversity Research, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME Branch for Bioresources, Gießen, Hessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snake venom is an ecologically relevant functional trait directly linked with a snake's fitness and survival, facilitating predation and defence. Snake venom variation occurs at all taxonomic levels, but the study at the intraspecific level is still in its early stages. The common adder (

Indexed as

colour phenotypesfolkloremelanismsnake venomvenom variationVipera berus

Identifiers

PMID39263452
PMCPMC11387060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.