Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39263391›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2023

A realist review of the causes of, and current interventions to address 'missingness' in health care.

Calum Lindsay, David Baruffati, Mhairi Mackenzie, David A Ellis, Michelle Major, Kate O'Donnell, Sharon Simpson, Andrea Williamson, Claire Duddy, Geoff Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. 'Challenging but ultimately rewarding' - lived experiences of Deep End Northern Ireland GPs: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Inclusion health and missingness in health care: dig where you stand.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Calum LindsayGeneral Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5087-3358
David BaruffatiGeneral Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5006-792X
Mhairi MackenzieUrban Studies, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
David A EllisSchool of Management, University of Bath, Bath, England, UK.
Michelle MajorHomeless Network Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Kate O'DonnellGeneral Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Sharon SimpsonMRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sci Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6219-1768
Andrea WilliamsonGeneral Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8981-9068
Claire DuddyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
Geoff WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-4157

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This protocol describes a realist review exploring the problem of "missingness" in healthcare, defined as the repeated tendency not to take up offers of care that has a negative impact on the person and their life chances. More specifically, the review looks at the phenomenon of patients missing multiple appointments in primary care in the UK - at the causal factors that influence how patients come to be "missing" in this way, and what interventions might support uptake and "presence" in healthcare. Background research informing this project suggests that a high rate of missed appointments predicted high premature death rates, and patients were more likely to have multiple long-term health conditions and experience significant socioeconomic disadvantage. Most research in this field focuses on population- or service-level characteristics of patients who miss appointments, often making no distinction between causes of single missed appointments and of multiple missed appointments. There have therefore been no interventions for 'missingness', accounting for the complex life circumstances or common mechanisms that cause people to repeatedly miss appointments. Methods: We use a realist review approach to explore what causes missingness - and what might prevent or address it - for whom, and in what circumstances. The review uses an iterative approach of database searching, citation-tracking and sourcing grey literature, with selected articles providing insight into the causal dynamics underpinning missed appointments and the interventions designed to address them. Discussion: The findings of this review will be combined with the findings of a qualitative empirical study and the contributions of a Stakeholder Advisory Group (STAG) to inform the development of a programme theory that seeks to explain how missingness occurs, whom it affects and under what circumstances. This will be used to develop a complex intervention to address multiple missed appointments in primary care. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022346006.

Indexed as

did not attendfailed appointmentsMissed appointmentsmissingnessnon-attendanceprimary careprotocolrealist review

Identifiers

PMID39263391
PMCPMC11387941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.