Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39263298›Full record

ArticleTranslational pediatrics2024

The effectiveness of

Huazi Liu, Qiang Fei, Tianming Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Acupuncture for the treatment of infantile colic.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huazi LiuDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, National Children's Regional Medical Center, Hangzhou, China.
Qiang FeiDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, National Children's Regional Medical Center, Hangzhou, China.
Tianming YuanDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, National Children's Regional Medical Center, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Infantile colic is common in pediatric patients, yet few probiotics effectively treat this condition. The efficacy of Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases from their inception until January 2024. We used Version 2 of the Cochrane tool (ROB 2) to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. The inclusion criteria followed the PICOS framework: (I) participants: infants with colic; (II) intervention: LGG administration at any dose; (III) control: placebo or no treatment; (IV) outcomes: primary outcome was crying or fussing time (minutes/day) at the end of the intervention, secondary outcomes included fecal calprotectin content (µg/g) and adverse events; (V) Study type: randomized controlled trials. Results: Four studies involving 168 infants with colic were included. The meta-analysis indicated that LGG significantly reduced daily crying time [mean difference (MD) =-32.59 minutes; 95% confidence interval (CI): -43.23 to -21.96; P<0.001] and fecal calprotectin content (MD =-103.28 µg/g; 95% CI: -149.30 to -7.26; P<0.001). Only one study reported adverse events. Conclusions: LGG is effective in treating infantile colic. Further studies are needed to examine the effects of different doses, administration schedules, and durations of LGG treatment in infants with varying feeding methods.

Indexed as

calprotectincolicLactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG)meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID39263298
PMCPMC11384430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.