Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39263280›Full record

ArticleTranslational pediatrics2024

Intranasal esketamine versus esketamine-dexmedetomidine combination for premedication in pediatric patients undergoing strabismus surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Hui Qiao, Yan Zhuang, Peipei Lv, Zhou Ye, Yu Lu, Jie Jia

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04757675 (A Comparison of S-ketamin, Dexmedetomidine, and Combination as Premedication in Children Undergoing ENT Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04757675 early_phase1completednot on this map

A Comparison of S-ketamin, Dexmedetomidine, and Combination as Premedication in Children Undergoing ENT Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorEye & ENT Hospital of Fudan UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled320ConditionsEmotions, Separation Anxiety, Pain, ProceduralArmsS-ketamine 0.3, S-ketamine 0.5, S-ketamine 2, S-ketamine 1+Dexmedetomidine 1, S-ketamine 0.5 +Dexmedetomidine 2
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hui Qiao *Department of Anesthesiology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yan Zhuang *Department of Anesthesiology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Peipei LvDepartment of Anesthesiology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhou YeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yu LuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jie JiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preoperative fear and anxiety are prevalent in children undergoing surgery. The combination of esketamine and dexmedetomidine has been proposed as a promising premedication for enhancing preoperative sedation and analgesia. This study compared the premedication efficacy of intranasal esketamine alone and esketamine-dexmedetomidine combination in pediatric patients undergoing strabismus surgery. Methods: One hundred and eighty preschool children aged 2-6 years scheduled for strabismus surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of the three groups: intranasal premedication with esketamine 2 mg/kg (Group K), esketamine 1 mg/kg and dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (Group KD1), or esketamine 0.5 mg/kg and dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg (Group KD2). The primary outcome was the level of sedation following the intervention, as measured by the modified Yale preoperative anxiety scale (mYPAS) and sedation scale (SS). Secondary outcomes included onset time of sedation, the successful rate of peripheral intravenous cannulation, parental separation anxiety scale (PSAS), mask acceptance scale (MAS), wake-up time, duration of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and premedication-related adverse effects. Results: After premedication, the mYPAS score gradually decreased in the three groups, with lower values in Group K than in Group KD1 and Group KD2 patients in 1, 5, and 10 min. SS in Group KD1 and Group KD2 steadily increased until 40 min after premedication, while SS in Group K increased in the first 5 min after premedication and maintained consistent levels during the remaining time. Sedation onset was substantially faster in Group K patients (11.4±7.8 min) than Group KD1 (18.1±7.5 min, P=0.006) and Group KD2 (18.4±6.8 min, P<0.001). PSAS, separation status, the successful rate of peripheral intravenous cannulation, and MAS were comparable among groups. There was no significant difference in terms of emergence time or duration of stay in the PACU among groups. More gastrointestinal events were observed in Group K (P<0.001). Conclusions: Intranasal premedication with 2 mg/kg esketamine produced a more rapid onset of sedation accompanied by more gastrointestinal reactions compared with a combination of esketamine and dexmedetomidine. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04757675.

Indexed as

dexmedetomidineesketaminePremedicationsedation

Identifiers

PMID39263280
PMCPMC11384442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.