Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39263236›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of food science2024

Scenario on Production, Processing, and Utilization of Grasspea (

Lamesgen Yegrem, Asnake Fikre, Shashitu Alelign

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of food science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lamesgen YegremEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research Deber Zeit Agricultural Research Center, Deber Zeit, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9336-4783
Asnake FikreEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research Deber Zeit Agricultural Research Center, Deber Zeit, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3024-2070
Shashitu AlelignEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research Deber Zeit Agricultural Research Center, Deber Zeit, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grasspeas are environmentally successful and robust legumes with major traits of interest for food and nutrition security. It is a critical crop in areas prone to drought, overmoisture stress, and famine, hence, regarded as an "insurance crop" because of its inherent resilience of climatic calamities. The current status and prospects of grasspea, as well as various breeding and food processing approaches to improve this crop for integration in diverse and sustainable agrifood systems, are discussed in this review. Grasspeas are often the source of important micronutrients and proteins (18%-34%), saving peoples' lives during famine. Grasspea consumption is increasing in some countries; however, uninterrupted consumption of grasspea should be avoided, especially when they are green or unripe and when they are raw. Effective food processing techniques are essential to reduce the neurotoxic hazards associated with eating grasspea. Several effective processing steps can be used to reduce toxicity in addition to the development of toxin-free varieties for production and consumption. With advances in the scientific investigation of the grasspea, integration of genetics, processing, and behavioral components has been suggested.

Indexed as

grasspeanutritional composition and food processingβ-ODAP

Identifiers

PMID39263236
PMCPMC11390239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.