ArticleHeliyon2024
Comparative simulation of green finance-driven oil production and expulsion: Technological innovation with Expulsinator and traditional pyrolysis in near-natural conditions.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-01-21Author Unresponsive · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Euphemisms for Plagiarism · Plagiarism of/in Article ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the impact of green finance and technological innovation on oil production and expulsion by comparing the Expulsinator with traditional pyrolysis methods. The Expulsinator introduces a novel approach to simulating compound production and expulsion in natural settings, utilizing hydrous decomposition in an open pass-on mode and lithostatic compression on an intact starting point disc with an undamaged mineral framework and chemical kerogen network. In contrast, traditional decomposition methods, while valuable for assessing production dynamics, are less suitable for studying primary emigration and expulsion due to sampling damage, improper pressure settings, closed-mode burning, or waterless pyrolysis. This study aims to assess the efficacy of energy production and expulsion emulation by the Expulsinator, driven by green finance initiatives, and compare it with traditional decomposition methods. Production and evacuation behaviors were evaluated using Rock Evaluation pyrolysis, HyPy, and covered small container pyrolysis (CSVP). The Expulsinator exhibited higher asphalt discharge than CSVP, attributed to increased bitumen cross-linking during traditional pyrolysis, which favors pyrobitumen formation. Variations in alkane quantities and structures were observed due to ejection impacts and production dynamics, especially delayed ejection from chromatography. Expulsinator hydrous CSVP ratios remained at 65 %, while TOC ratios exceeded 81 %. Lower gas production was observed compared to CSVP, with higher Expulsinator TOC conversion explained by the rapid removal of produced products in the open setup to prevent reformation. The Expulsinator provides valuable data on oil and gas production suitable for computational modeling tasks, highlighting the role of green finance and technological innovation in advancing sustainable energy solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.