Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39263163›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Impact of green energy production for sustainable economic growth and green economic recovery.

Qiao Zeng, Caixia Li, Cosimo Magazzino

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qiao ZengSchool of Business, Chongqing College of Humanities, Science and Technology, China.
Caixia LiSchool of Business, Chongqing College of Humanities, Science and Technology, China.
Cosimo MagazzinoDepartment of Political Science, Roma Tre University, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Green energy (GE) is frequently associated with sustainable development, which seeks to reduce global warming and its adverse effects on the environment, economy, and social justice. This study examines the impact of green energy on economic prosperity, green economic recovery, and long-term sustainability. This study analyses 33 industrialized and developing nations between 1991 and 2022 in the context of green energy, sustainable economic growth, and green economic recovery. Pooled Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), the Fixed Effects Model (FEM), and the Random Effects Model (REM) are employed for analysis, and outcomes are analyzed using the Hausman specification test. The results show that both population increase and gross domestic product per capita significantly affect sustainable development. When compared, a hike in green energy prices contributes considerably to and positively to sustainable development. These results are helpful for policymakers and newcomers interested in green energy and renewable energy sources since they provide a framework to conduct more research and develop policy.

Indexed as

Green economic recoveryGreen energyNatural resourcesSustainable development

Identifiers

PMID39263163
PMCPMC11387328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.