ArticleHeliyon2024
Molecular precision medicine: Multi-omics-based stratification model for acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Molecular targets and mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicine combined with chemotherapy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis and multi-omics approach.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Genotoxicity of cancer therapies and the risk of secondary malignancies: toward personalized prevention.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Programmed death 1 antibody drug conjugates (PD 1 ADCs): Innovations in overcoming resistance and enhancing immune mediated antitumor activity.Translational oncology · 2026Review
- Multiomic State-Transitions Reveal Post-Treatment Transcriptome Desynchronization in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based prognostic models in acute myeloid leukemia: systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood neoplasia · 2026Article
- Central Nervous System Involvement in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: From Pathophysiology to Neuroradiologic Features and the Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The role of advanced diagnostics on precision medicine in hemato oncology.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Classification of acute myeloid leukemia based on multi-omics and prognosis prediction value.Molecular oncology · 2025Article
- Genetic Profiling of Acute and Chronic Leukemia via Next-Generation Sequencing: Current Insights and Future Perspectives.Hematology reports · 2025Review
- Article
- Research advances in the adjunctive diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as the most common malignancy of the hematopoietic system, poses challenges in treatment efficacy, relapse, and drug resistance. In this study, we have utilized 151 RNA sequencing datasets, 194 DNA methylation datasets, and 200 somatic mutation datasets from the AML cohort in the TCGA database to develop a multi-omics stratification model. This model enables comparison of prognosis, clinical features, gene mutations, immune microenvironment and drug sensitivity across subgroups. External validation datasets have been sourced from the GEO database, which includes 562 mRNA datasets and 136 miRNA datasets from 984 adult AML patients. Through multi-omics-based stratification model, we classified 126 AML patients into 4 clusters (CS). CS4 had the best prognosis, with the youngest age, highest M3 subtype proportion, fewest copy number alterations, and common mutations in WT1, FLT3, and KIT genes. It showed sensitivity to HDAC inhibitors and BCL-2 inhibitors. Both the M3 subtype and CS4 were identified as independent protective factors for survival. Conversely, CS3 had the worst prognosis due to older age, high copy number alterations, and frequent mutations in RUNX1, DNMT3A, and TP53 genes. Additionally, it showed higher proportions of cytotoxic cells and Tregs, suggesting potential sensitivity to mTOR inhibitors. CS1 had a better prognosis than CS2, with more copy number alterations, while CS2 had higher monocyte proportions. CS1 showed good sensitivity to cytarabine, while CS2 was sensitive to RXR agonists. Both CS1 and CS2, which predominantly featured mutations in FLT3, NPM1, and DNMT3A genes, benefited from FLT3 inhibitors. Using the Kappa test, our stratification model underwent robust validation in the miRNA and mRNA external validation datasets. With advancements in sequencing technology and machine learning algorithms, AML is poised to transition towards multi-omics precision medicine in the future. We aspire for our study to offer new perspectives on multi-drug combination clinical trials and multi-targeted precision medicine for AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.