Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39263155›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Determining the areas most suitable for urban land use while minimizing impact on natural areas. The case of the Machachi Valley, Ecuador.

Rene Ulloa-Espindola, Susana Martín-Fernández

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rene Ulloa-EspindolaETSI Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria sn, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Susana Martín-FernándezCentro para la Conservación de la Biodiversidad y el Desarrollo Sostenible, ETSI de Montes, Forestal y del Medio Natural, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, c/ José Antonio Nováis 10, 2804, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the impact of urban growth on the environment, especially in developing countries, decision-making tools are needed to help locate the ideal areas for urban use. This study aims to identify the areas most suitable for urban use, minimizing their impact on forest land use in an area with high urban sprawl. As a new development, the study also considers the connectivity between forest-use patches and the loss of forest area as decision variables. The methodology used to determine these areas was AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) with GIS (Geography Information System). Twenty experts evaluated the criteria, considering forest conservation in addition to urban suitability. Socio-economic, physical, and environmental criteria and sub-criteria were scored with values from 1 to 5, with 5 indicating the maximum potential of the pixel to accommodate urban use. The study area was the Machachi Valley and the conurbation of Quito in Ecuador. The results indicate that the most suitable urban areas are located in the buffer that surrounds the initial urban use, and the land along the Pan-American Highway. The most vulnerable forest zone was in the south center of Quito and on the hillsides of the Pasochoa volcano. The results were also compared with maps that estimate the evolution of the land uses in this valley in the coming years. Based on this comparison, maintenance of current trends will result in a significant loss of native forest and fragmentation of forest patches in the lower valley. The information provided by maps of suitable urban use is a useful tool to protect the natural resources that land use policies should take into consideration.

Indexed as

Environmental criteriaForest fragmentationMCDMNative forestUrban spread

Identifiers

PMID39263155
PMCPMC11388794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.