ReviewHeliyon2024
Emerging research trends in artificial intelligence for cancer diagnostic systems: A comprehensive review.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Use of Machine Learning for Analyzing Real-World Data in Disease Prediction and Management: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- The application of random forest-based models in prognostication of gastrointestinal tract malignancies: a systematic review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in cancer epigenomics: a review on advances in pan-cancer detection and precision medicine.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2025Review
- Integrating AI into Cancer Immunotherapy-A Narrative Review of Current Applications and Future Directions.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- OncoProExp: An interactive shiny web application for comprehensive cancer proteomics and phosphoproteomics analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Recent advances in applications of artificial intelligence-assisted Raman spectroscopy in diagnosis of cancers.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Snap Diagnosis: Developing an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Penile Cancer Detection from Photographs.Cancers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-04-15Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review article offers a comprehensive analysis of current developments in the application of machine learning for cancer diagnostic systems. The effectiveness of machine learning approaches has become evident in improving the accuracy and speed of cancer detection, addressing the complexities of large and intricate medical datasets. This review aims to evaluate modern machine learning techniques employed in cancer diagnostics, covering various algorithms, including supervised and unsupervised learning, as well as deep learning and federated learning methodologies. Data acquisition and preprocessing methods for different types of data, such as imaging, genomics, and clinical records, are discussed. The paper also examines feature extraction and selection techniques specific to cancer diagnosis. Model training, evaluation metrics, and performance comparison methods are explored. Additionally, the review provides insights into the applications of machine learning in various cancer types and discusses challenges related to dataset limitations, model interpretability, multi-omics integration, and ethical considerations. The emerging field of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in cancer diagnosis is highlighted, emphasizing specific XAI techniques proposed to improve cancer diagnostics. These techniques include interactive visualization of model decisions and feature importance analysis tailored for enhanced clinical interpretation, aiming to enhance both diagnostic accuracy and transparency in medical decision-making. The paper concludes by outlining future directions, including personalized medicine, federated learning, deep learning advancements, and ethical considerations. This review aims to guide researchers, clinicians, and policymakers in the development of efficient and interpretable machine learning-based cancer diagnostic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.