ArticleHeliyon2024
Comparison and classification of photovoltaic system architectures for limiting the impact of the partial shading phenomenon.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article proposes a comparison and classification of PV system architectures with the aim of limiting the impact of the partial shading phenomenon which remains one of the most harmful defects during the production of electrical energy with significant consequences on output power, current and voltage. the methodological approach used consists of analyzing in depth the main most recent architectures developed in the current literature with their advantages and disadvantages; then define five partial shading scenarios for different irradiance levels (1000W/m2; 900W/m2; 700W/m2; 500W/m2; 300W/m2), which will then be immediately applied to five other proposed architectures: SP (serial-parallel), BL (Bridge-Link); HC (Honey Comb); TCT (Total-Cross-Tied); TSPL (Triple Series Parallel Ladder); the values obtained at the output with each of its architectures will be used for an in-depth descriptive analysis with PCA (principal component analysis) in statistics but to carry out a comparative analysis between the architectures. All with a Matlab Simulink 2022.b software environment. The results obtained offer a strong positive correlation for TCP and TSPL architectures with better weight compared to other architectures. All in accordance with the IEEE-519-2022 standard. This work is therefore positioned as a contribution to the optimization of the performance of electrical energy production through the use of PV systems which today represent widely used alternatives in the renewable energy register.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.