ArticleHeliyon2024
Comparative efficacy of the five most common traditional Chinese medicine monomers in reducing intimal hyperproliferation in arterial balloon injury models: A network meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study utilized network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of five commonly used traditional Chinese medicine monomers in reducing intimal hyperproliferation in arterial balloon injury models. Methods: Relevant literature up to January 2024 was systematically retrieved from seven major databases. The intima-to-media (I/M) ratio was chosen as the primary outcome measure. The risk of bias in animal studies was assessed using the SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) tool. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata 17 software. Results: A total of 43 studies were included in this meta-analysis. NMA results showed that in the rat model, compared to the control group, GS (SMD: 0.99, 95%CI: 1.25 to -0.73), ASIV (SMD: 1.16, 95%CI: 1.65 to -0.67), TMP (SMD: 0.68, 95%CI: 1.31 to -0.05), and TPNS (SMD: 1.36, 95%CI: 1.91 to -0.80) exhibited inhibitory effects on postoperative intimal hyperproliferation, reducing the I/M ratio. In the rabbit model, compared to the control group, TPNS (SMD: 1.23, 95%CI: 1.97 to -0.49) inhibited postoperative intimal hyperproliferation and reduced the I/M ratio. Superiority ranking analysis suggested that total Conclusion: NMA indicates that traditional Chinese medicine monomers can effectively reduce postoperative intimal hyperproliferation in arterial balloon injury models, lowering the I/M ratio, with TPNS showing optimal efficacy. However, the research on TIIA is insufficient, and the limited sample size may affect the robustness of the results. Furthermore, the majority of research on traditional Chinese medicine monomers is currently limited to the experimental stage, lacking further clinical validation. Conducting standardized animal experiments and reporting their findings can enhance the quality of evidence from animal studies, laying the foundation for future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.