ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2024
Efficacy of ALK inhibitors in Asian patients with ALK inhibitor-naïve advanced
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of the efficacy based on clinicopathological characteristics and the safety of first-line treatments for patients with advanced ALK rearrangement non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Patient preference for first-line treatments of ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a discrete choice experiment.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Clinical Evaluation of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitors for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on the 2nd Edition of China's Drug Evaluation and Selection Guideline.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Optimizing long-term treatment with ALK inhibitors: balancing efficacy and safety.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Mapping the evolution and frontiers ofTranslational lung cancer research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A previous network meta-analysis (NMA) compared the efficacy of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors in Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google, and Baidu. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), or disease control rate (DCR) results of Asian patients with ALK inhibitor-naïve advanced Results: Eight studies, involving 1,477 Asian patients and seven treatments (crizotinib, alectinib, brigatinib, ensartinib, envonalkib, iruplinalkib, and lorlatinib), were included in the NMA. In terms of the overall risks of bias, all of the studies had "some concerns". All the next-generation ALK inhibitors were statistically superior to crizotinib in terms of PFS. Iruplinalkib had the best surface under the cumulative ranking curve (74.0%), followed by brigatinib (69.1%) and ensartinib (63.7%). Most of the pairwise comparisons did not reveal significant differences in the ORR and DCR. In terms of both the ORR and DCR, alectinib ranked first, followed by lorlatinib. Conclusions: Next-generation ALK inhibitors had better efficacy than crizotinib in the treatment of Asian patients with ALK inhibitor-naïve advanced
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.