Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39263012›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2024

Haoda Huang, Zeping Yan, Bingliang Li, Weixiang Lu, Ping He, Lei Fan, Xiaowei Wu, Hengrui Liang, Jianxing He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haoda HuangNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zeping YanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Bingliang LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Weixiang LuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ping HeDepartment of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lei FanDepartment of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaowei WuDepartment of Pathology, Jieyang people's Hospital, Jieyang, China.
Hengrui LiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianxing HeNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early-stage invasive lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) characterized by a predominant micropapillary or solid pattern exhibit an elevated risk of recurrence following sub-lobar resection, thus determining histological subtype of early-stage invasive ADC prior surgery is important for formulating lobectomy or sub-lobar resection. This study aims to develop a deep learning algorithm and assess its clinical capability in distinguishing high-risk or low-risk histologic patterns in early-stage invasive ADC based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: Two retrospective cohorts were included: development cohort 1 and external test cohort 2, comprising patients diagnosed with T1 stage invasive ADC. Electronic medical records and CT scans of all patients were documented. Patients were stratified into two risk groups. High-risk group: comprising cases with a micropapillary component ≥5% or a predominant solid pattern. Low-risk group: encompassing cases with a micropapillary component <5% and an absence of a predominant solid pattern. The overall segmentation model was modified based on Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Mask-RCNN), and Residual Network 50 (ResNet50)_3D was employed for image classification. Results: A total of 432 patients participated in this study, with 385 cases in cohort 1 and 47 cases in cohort 2. The fine-outline results produced by the auto-segmentation model exhibited a high level of agreement with manual segmentation by human experts, yielding a mean dice coefficient of 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85-0.87] in cohort 1 and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.82-0.85) in cohort 2. Furthermore, the deep learning model effectively differentiated the high-risk group from the low-risk group, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.88-0.90) in cohort 1. In the external validation conducted in cohort 2, the deep learning model displayed an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.88) in distinguishing the high-risk group from the low-risk group. The average diagnostic time was 16.00±3.2 seconds, with an accuracy of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.81-0.83). Conclusions: We have developed a deep learning algorithm,

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence (AI)early-stage invasive lung adenocarcinoma (early-stage invasive lung ADC)histologic patterns

Identifiers

PMID39263012
PMCPMC11384487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.