ArticleHeliyon2024
Innovative computed tomography based mapping of the surgical posterior tympanotomy: An exploratory study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tomographic comparison of the cochlea, oval window, round window and facial nerve between adults and children and their influence on cochlear implant surgery.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic devices have recently enhanced cochlear implantation by improving precision resulting in reduced intracochlear damage during electrode insertion. This study aimed to gain first insights into the expected dimensions of the cone-like workspace from the posterior tympanotomy towards the round window membrane. This retrospective chart review analyzed ten postoperative CT scans of adult patients who were implanted with a CI in the past ten years. The dimensions of the cone-like workspace were determined using four landmarks (P1-P4). In the anteroposterior range, P1 and P2 were defined on the edge of the bony layer over the facial nerve and chorda tympani nerve, respectively. In the inferosuperior range, P3 was defined on the bony edge of the incus buttress and P4 was obtained at a distance of 0.45 mm between the facial nerve and the chorda tympani nerve. After selecting the landmarks, the calculations of the dimensions of the surgical access space were done in a standardized coordinate system and presented using descriptive statistics. The cone-like space is limited by two maximal angles,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.