ReviewHeliyon2024
Intracranial metastasis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A literature review of published case reports and case presentation.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intracranial metastasis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is uncommon and the optimal management for these patients remains undefined. The introduction of selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has drastically improved survival in patients with GISTs. However, its efficacy in patients with intracranial metastasis of GISTs is uncertain due to poor penetration of the blood brain barrier. The role of surgery and radiotherapy in these patients has also not been established. No large-scale studies exist, and the literature is limited to case reports. We report a case treated at our institution, conducted a literature review of existing case reports, and discussed the optimal management of patients with intracranial metastasis of GISTs. Methods: A literature review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All studies with intracranial metastasis of GISTs were included, with data extracted and analyzed in totality. Results: 26 cases were included in the review. The median time to diagnosis of intracranial metastasis in patients with previously known GISTs was 66 months. Solitary metastasis was seen in 16 cases (59.3 %). 18 patients (69.72 %) underwent surgical resection; 14 had additive therapy with 9 receiving TKI. The mean duration of follow up was 11 months. Clinical response was seen in 3 patients in the non-surgical group, all 3 were treated with TKI alone. Conclusion: The effectiveness of TKI in intracranial GISTs metastasis is seen both as first-line therapy for asymptomatic lesions and as an additive treatment post-surgery. Surgery retains a key role in establishing histological and molecular diagnosis and for symptomatic relief of mass effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.