Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39262904›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024

Assessing core outcome set uptake in randomized controlled trials for chronic kidney disease: Cross-sectional analysis.

Alex Hagood, Logan Patrick Corwin, Jay S Modi, Garrett A Jones, Kyle J Fitzgerald, Kimberly J Magana, Shaelyn A Ward, Trevor R Magee, Griffin K Hughes, Alicia Ito Ford and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alex HagoodOffice of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Logan Patrick CorwinOffice of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Jay S ModiOffice of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Garrett A JonesOffice of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Kyle J FitzgeraldOffice of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Kimberly J MaganaOffice of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Shaelyn A WardOffice of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Trevor R MageeOffice of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Griffin K HughesOffice of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Alicia Ito FordOffice of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Matt VassarOffice of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Main problem: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive condition that affects millions of people worldwide. A standardized core outcome set (COS) was developed for CKD by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes and Measurements in 2019. This study aims to evaluate the frequency of measurement for these outcomes before and after the publication of the COS. Methods: A literature search was done to gather the phase III/IV clinical trials evaluating chronic kidney disease through ClinicalTrials.gov. Data extraction of included studies was completed in a masked, duplicate fashion. The included studies were evaluated for characteristics such as survival, burden of disease, patient-reported health-related quality of life, and treatment modality-specific outcomes. Results: Our results showed that the majority of all COS domains were inadequately measured in CKD clinical trials before and after publication of the COS. Despite the increase in COS measurements following publication, the average percent of COS outcomes measured was less than 40 % per year even after four years. Conclusion: There is a notable deficiency in the complete measurement of COS among all domains both before and after COS publication. We suggest efforts be made to improve the adoption of consistent outcome measures that would benefit the growing population of patients affected by CKD.

Indexed as

Core Out Come SetRCTUptake

Identifiers

PMID39262904
PMCPMC11387250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.