ArticleIEEE Visualization Conference : VIS. IEEE Conference on Visualization2020
Explainable Spatial Clustering: Leveraging Spatial Data in Radiation Oncology.
Article in IEEE Visualization Conference : VIS. IEEE Conference on Visualization, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- DITTO: A Visual Digital Twin for Interventions and Temporal Treatment Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics · 2025Article
- Roses Have Thorns: Understanding the Downside of Oncological Care Delivery Through Visual Analytics and Sequential Rule Mining.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics · 2024Article
- Spatially-aware clustering improves AJCC-8 risk stratification performance in oropharyngeal carcinomas.Oral oncology · 2023Article
- DASS Good: Explainable Data Mining of Spatial Cohort Data.Computer graphics forum : journal of the European Association for Computer Graphics · 2023Article
- THALIS: Human-Machine Analysis of Longitudinal Symptoms in Cancer Therapy.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics · 2022Article
- Precision association of lymphatic disease spread with radiation-associated toxicity in oropharyngeal squamous carcinomas.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in data collection in radiation therapy have led to an abundance of opportunities for applying data mining and machine learning techniques to promote new data-driven insights. In light of these advances, supporting collaboration between machine learning experts and clinicians is important for facilitating better development and adoption of these models. Although many medical use-cases rely on spatial data, where understanding and visualizing the underlying structure of the data is important, little is known about the interpretability of spatial clustering results by clinical audiences. In this work, we reflect on the design of visualizations for explaining novel approaches to clustering complex anatomical data from head and neck cancer patients. These visualizations were developed, through participatory design, for clinical audiences during a multi-year collaboration with radiation oncologists and statisticians. We distill this collaboration into a set of lessons learned for creating visual and explainable spatial clustering for clinical users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.