ArticleiScience2024
A multicenter prospective study on the ESC algorithm for the early diagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical performance validation and four diagnostic strategy assessments of high-sensitivity troponin I assays.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the optimal high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI)-based algorithm for early diagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in Chinese patients. We prospectively enrolled 1,606 patients with suspected NSTEMI from three emergency departments across China, collecting blood samples at 0, 1, and 3 h post-admission. Patients were classified using the 0/1-h and 0/3-h algorithms. The 2015 and 2020 ESC 0/1-h algorithms rapidly triaged 70% of patients with high negative predictive value (NPV) (99.7%) and sensitivity (99.5%). The 0/3-h algorithm showed higher specificity (93.8%) but lower NPV (96.8%) and sensitivity (91.2%). An optimized 0/1-h algorithm improved specificity to 92.1% while maintaining high NPV (99.7%) and sensitivity (99.2%). Low 30-day and 180-day all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates were observed in rule-out groups for all algorithms. The ESC 0/1-h algorithm is a safe and efficient triage method for patients with suspected NSTEMI, with optimization further enhancing specificity and efficiency for the Chinese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.