ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Diagnostic value of nanopore sequencing technology in nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical features of nontuberculous mycobacteria and diagnosis with nanopore targeted sequencing: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2026Article
- Nanopore Sequencing in Mycobacterial Diagnostics: Clinical and Laboratory Roles of mNGS and tNGS.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the diagnostic value of nanopore sequencing technology for detecting nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) in bronchial alveolar lavage fluid (BALF).
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 83 patients with suspected NTM-PD admitted to Anhui Chest Hospital from January 2021 to November 2023. All patients underwent bronchoscopic examination, and BALF samples were collected for smear acid-fast staining, mycobacterial culture, and nanopore sequencing. The diagnostic efficiencies of these three methods were compared.
resultsAmong these patients, 27 were diagnosed with NTM-PD, 43 with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), and 13 with other lung diseases (OLD). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of nanopore sequencing for diagnosing NTM-PD were 88.9%, 87.5%, 77.4%, and 94.2%, respectively. Nanopore sequencing demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity than smear and culture methods. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for nanopore sequencing was 0.882, significantly higher than that of smear (0.547) and culture (0.658), with
conclusionNanopore sequencing technology has high diagnostic efficiency for NTM-PD and can directly identify bacterial species, but specificity issues should be considered in clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.