ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Impact of dental operative microscopes on precision in minimally invasive dental restoration procedures.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effect of dental operative microscopes on precision in minimally invasive dental restoration procedures.
methodsThis retrospective analysis included patients who underwent minimally invasive dental restoration procedure at Nanjing Stomatological Hospital from March 2018 to December 2019. Patients were categorized into two groups, an observation group treated with microscope-guided provisional restorations, and a control group treated using conventional methods. Clinical indices, including implant survival rates over five years, were compared between the groups. Multivariate analysis was employed to identify independent risk factors for implant failure.
resultsAfter treatment the observation group exhibited significantly lower labial vertical marginal discrepancies and absolute marginal discrepancies, as well as improved labial gingival indices and periodontal probing depths compared to the control group (all P<0.001). Additionally, the observation group scored significantly higher in efficiency, accuracy, and overall quality of tooth preparation (all P<0.001). Clinicians using microscopes demonstrated significantly lower mean Rapid Upper Limb Assessment scores, indicating reduced ergonomic strain (P<0.001). Higher age, worn tooth defects, poor oral hygiene, and non-use of a microscope were identified as independent risk factors for implant failure at the five-year mark.
conclusionDental operative microscopes significantly enhance the precision, efficiency, and ergonomic comfort in minimally invasive dental restorations for both clinicians and patients. Widespread adoption of this technology is strongly recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.