Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39262719›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024

Meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of magnetic stimulation for chronic pelvic pain.

Huixiang Li, Keqiang Yu, Ping Xue, Jueying Xiang, Jing Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huixiang LiDivision of Surgery, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Keqiang YuDivision of Surgery, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ping XueDivision of Surgery, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jueying XiangDivision of Surgery, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jing WuDivision of Surgery, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically assess the effectiveness and safety of magnetic stimulation (MS) for treating chronic prostatitis (CP) and chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) through a meta-analysis.

methodsA comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, VIP, Web of Science, WanFang, China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc), and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI) databases was conducted to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on MS interventions for CPPS from inception to the present. The search employed keywords such as "MS", "CPPS", and "prostatitis". Data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software, focusing on NIH-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax), and international index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5) score.

resultsEight RCTs involving 636 patients were included. Our meta-analysis revealed that extracorporeal MS significantly reduced NIH-CPSI scores [MD = -6.65; 95% CI (-8.15, -5.15), P < 0.00001] and improved Qmax [MD = 2.98; 95% CI (1.36, 4.59), P = 0.0003] compared to the control group. Although a trend toward improved IIEF-5 scores was observed [MD = 0.81; 95% CI (-0.34, 1.95), P = 0.17], the results were not significant.

conclusionMS is effective in alleviating clinical symptoms and enhancing Qmax in patients with CP/CPPS.

Indexed as

chronic pelvic pain syndromeMagnetic field therapymeta-analysisprostatitis

Identifiers

PMID39262719
PMCPMC11384379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.