ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024
Thromboembolic events in severe postpartum hemorrhage treated with recombinant activated factor VII: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effects of recombinant human activated factor VII and tranexamic acid on traumatic bleeding and mortality in mice.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Thromboembolic events in severe postpartum hemorrhage treated with recombinant activated factor VII: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is an obstetric complication with high associated morbidity. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is used to treat severe PPH when uterotonics fail to stop bleeding. However, data on the safety of rFVIIa treatment of severe PPH from adequately powered trials are lacking. We systematically reviewed published data on the incidence of thromboembolic events (TEs) in women with PPH treated or not treated with rFVIIa (PROSPERO CRD42022360736). Databases (Embase, MEDLINE, BIOSIS, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Library) were searched for peer-reviewed publications published between January 1996 and August 2022 and conference abstracts published between January 2017 and August 2022 using search terms related to thromboembolism or infarction and PPH. Data were extracted from all publications reporting on a general population of women with PPH with information on TEs. Descriptive summary statistics and the estimated proportion of TEs were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model based on the binomial distribution. Quality assessments were based on the checklist by Downs and Black. From 1637 potentially eligible studies, 55 publications were included reporting on 611 women treated and 32,488 women not treated with rFVIIa. The global estimated proportion of TEs was 1.82% (prediction interval [PI], 0.30-10.23) and 0.72% (PI, 0.03-16.47) in women with severe PPH treated and those not treated with rFVIIa, respectively. The estimated proportions of TEs were similarly small, with wide and largely overlapping PIs. Additional well-designed trials are needed to improve understanding of TE incidence in PPH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.