ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2024
Comparative evaluations of shear bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine, and calcium-enriched mixture to bulk-fill flowable composite using three different adhesive systems: An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Shear Bond Strength Between Calcium Silicate-Based Biomaterials and Glass Ionomer Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Comparative Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Microshear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Potassium Nitrate-Modified Polycarboxylate Cement at Two Time Points Using Different Adhesive Approaches: An In Vitro Study.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
- Investigation of the Combined Impact of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and Bacterial Cellulose Nanocrystals on the Bond Strength to Dentin and Fracture Resistance of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Primary Molars.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Article
- Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate with and without silver nanoparticles: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Review
- Comparative evaluation of cytotoxic effects of a new biomaterial nanohydroxyapatite-lactoferrin, nanohydroxyapatite, mineral trioxide aggregate, and calcium-enriched mixture on human dental pulp stem cells.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Effect of Universal Adhesive Etching Mode on Shear Bond Strength of Pulp Capping Materials to Deep Dentin.BioMed research international · 2025Article
- Effect of Mesoporous Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle Incorporation on the Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Enamel and Dentin: An In Vitro Study.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the success of different protective liners after performing selective caries removal.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2025Review
- Comparative analysis of Biodentine and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate repair High Plasticity in reinforcing roots with perforation: An in vitro study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Effect of Chitosan-Based Irrigation Solutions on the Bond Strength of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate to Bulk-Fill Composite.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the shear bond strength of bulk-fill flowable composite resin smart dentin replacement plus when bonded to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-angelus, biodentine, and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) at two different aging periods (15 min and 72 h) using three distinct adhesive systems. In addition, the study identified the specific modes of failure (adhesive, cohesive, or mixed) using a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope. Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty-six cylindrical acrylic blocks used in the study were sorted into three groups based on the bioactive substance used to fill the 3-mm diameter and 3-mm high hole in the center of each block. The groups were MTA, Biodentine, and CEM. The specimens were then divided into subgroups based on the aging interval (15 min and 72 h) of the bioactive material and the adhesive system used (two-step total-etch, two-step self-etch [SE], and one-step SE) while bonding to the restorative bulk-fill flowable composite. The shear bond strength values were measured with a universal testing machine, and the data were analyzed using two-way and one-way analysis of variance, followed by a Results: The study showed that the type of adhesive system and the time of bonding affected the shear bond strength of bulk-fill composite to the pulp capping agents ( Conclusion: MTA demonstrated the highest bond strength with two-step SE group at 15 min, and CEM exhibited the highest bond strength with two-step SE groups at 72 h interval. For biodentine group, the type of adhesive used did not impact the bond strength values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.