ReviewBrain & spine2024
Robotic-assisted surgery for adult spinal deformity. A systematic review.
Review in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of the clinical efficacy between AUSS-TLIF combined with tianJi ROBOT-assisted PPSF and conventional TLIF in the treatment of Single-Stage lumbar spondylolisthesis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Surgical planning for spinal deformity correction: the contribution of patient-specific rods.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Risk factors of inaccurate screw placement in robotic spine surgeries: why do robots make error and how to avoid them?Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Current Applications and Future Directions of Technologies Used in Adult Deformity Surgery for Personalized Alignment: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Assessment and Management of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: From the Perspective of a Physiatrist.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2025Article
- Robotic spine surgery compared with fluoroscopic-assisted surgery: advantages, disadvantages, future perspectives.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Does Robotic Spine Surgery Add Value to Surgical Practice over Navigation-Based Systems? A Study on Operating Room Efficiency.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The goal of this systematic review is to offer a detailed summary of the present status of robotic-assisted surgery for adult spinal deformity. Methods: This review is based on articles systematically searched in PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science Core Collection databases on robotic-assisted surgery for adult spinal deformity. Differences in the precision of pedicle screw placement, duration of surgery, and incidence of complications between robotic-assisted surgery and the conventional open surgery were considered. Results: A total of 172 articles were retrieved from the literature search. A total of 168 articles were excluded. Therefore, this systematic review included the remaining four original articles, including accuracy of pedicle screw placement, operative time, radiation exposure, intraoperative and postoperative complications, respectively. The overall level of evidence in the studies was moderate to low. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted surgery for adult spinal deformity demonstrates the potential to enhance the precision of screw placement, possibly reduce intraoperative and postoperative complications, and decrease radiation exposure. However, the impact on operation duration requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.